【内容摘要】犯罪论体系是认知犯罪、评价犯罪的工具,它本身不是目的,而是服务于刑事法律实践而存在的,其理论地位既不应看得过低,也不必拔得过高。三阶层与四要件两种犯罪论体系在构造上的差别主要体现为对犯罪要素的排列组合方法不同,二者并无太大实质差异。理论与实务存在距离,在理论上同时承认两种犯罪论体系,不会导致刑事司法实务的混乱。不同的犯罪论体系可以并存地供实务界选择,同时掌握两种体系(事实上并不难)是当下中国法官应当具备的起码素质。 【关键词】 犯罪论体系 三阶层 四要件 并存
最新问答
我想把论文从word格式转换成PDF格式,用的金山WPS,可转换完成之后,里面的流程图就不见了,空白~~这是为什么呢?谁能帮我解决一下!谢谢!
热门问答
我想把论文从word格式转换成PDF格式,用的金山WPS,可转换完成之后,里面的流程图就不见了,空白~~这是为什么呢?谁能帮我解决一下!谢谢!
This research extends the knowledge calibration paradigm to include emotional calibration. Two studies were conducted to investigate the effects of emotional calibration on consumer decision making. Emotionally calibrated consumers made higher-quality food choices, and these effects were predictive beyond cognitive ability and cognitive calibration. In a field experiment, emotional calibration enhanced obese consumers' decision quality by attenuating the impact of impulsive eating on caloric intake and reducing the effect of a vivid